Friday, January 22, 2010

In Times of Need

For nine years, your family has been tenaciously saving for a new sailboat. You have accumulated about 1/10th of what you need, and hard times hit.  Your income is reduced drastically.  It is time to reevaluate and reallocate your family's spending and saving priorities.  This month, expenses exceed revenues.  But to some extent, this is self inflicted- you are choosing to put $75 toward a sailboat that (1) you may never get, and (2) you will rarely use.  Since you have to pay for shelter and food, any rational analyst would suggest, at least temporarily, halting the monthly contributions to the sailboat dream fund, especially when not doing so would result in homelessness and starvation.  Further, if the financial problem worsened, that accumulated fund would serve to help carry our distraught family through until the situation improved and they could continue on the path to future sailboat ownership. 
The average homeowner in the Western Elmore County Recreation District is contributing about $75 per year toward a dream center, which is no closer to building than the day it was formed.  They are not using the money for anything, let alone something arguably useful like recreation (which is, incidentally, their purpose).  An absolutley critical government function, that of education, is in a severe financial crisis, unprecedented in severity.  It's probably not even close to legal for the Recreation District to outright transfer their funding to the school, but here is a way they can help, legally and ethically. The responsible course is for the Recreation District Directors to contact the school board, and arrange the following:
The Recreation District will immediately cease its levy for this year, freeing up $75 worth of taxpayer funds previously allocated to nothing at all.  The recreation district operates on only $116000 per year and has 1.3 million in the bank- they will be able to operate on what they already possess.
The school district could then simultaneously ask the taxpayers for $75 worth of an emergency supplemental levy- and since the Recreation District just turned theirs off, it would not cost the taxpayer any more than what they are paying now.  Both entities could talk to the taxpayers simultaneously about the switch, helping the levy to pass.
Presto- $440,000 of new money for the school, and no additional cost to the taxpayer. 
Further, the Recreation District could offer to temporarily lease from the school some of the district's property, like ball fields and such.  The Recreation District could then assume the maintenance responsibility for those items, by using part of the on-hand 1.3 million, further alleviating the financial burden on the school.
Leasing and maintaining items like ball fields is legal, and well within the mandate of recreation. 

Just till times get better, then we could go back to saving for our sailboat.

4 comments:

  1. Too much common sense in this plan Silence (great idea) because the Mickey Mouse Club (aka WECRD Board) will NEVER agree to this. Do you not know that they are holding on to every dime they can to build a recreation center (or buy a sailboat)! Must save EVERY dime...unless of course Betty/the MHAC asks for money...

    They are fulfilling the mandate dude. Nothing can get in their way---not even factual ideas from the YMCA/CDLC (please see Betty Ashcraft's email attached hereto:

    From: Betty Ashcraft [
    Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 7:28 AM
    To: Sara at HUD
    Subject: Re: Western

    Sara,
    Thanks for the update. Here's the latest on the storage tanks: The property next door is undergoing some cleanup. I have not confirmed as yet the placement of the storage tanks, but I was told that they were nearly empty last spring and expected to be empty by this fall. Will that affect their status?

    On February 9, 2009, I had received an email from Stan Olson, our architect, that the current position of the storage tanks was 240 feet from the proposed building site. Since that time we have entered into talks with the YMCA and our building design will be altered according to the future market study. The building will still be within the footprint created by Stan Olson and Todd Waite, the surveyor. The footprint is what is 240 feet from the storage tanks.

    There are no planned outdoor activities that would require the extra distance.

    Do you need an official letter from Stan stating these distances from the storage tanks? Do you need an official letter from Todd Waite about the footprint of the building in relation to the storage tanks? Do you need a letter from the WECRD about there being no outdoor activities?

    I will put together whatever you require. Thanks for your assistance.

    Betty Ashcraft

    HMMMMMMMMMMM. Proudly, OM

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maybe you should wait until you get back to Chicago to buy the sailboat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Power boating is my thing. Thank you. Not going back to Chicago. I am invested here, thank you. Much work to be done.

    OM

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Opinion Missy", there's no comment in Silence B Dogood's post that mentions you. You didn't even mention boating of any sort in your "proud" comment. I was commenting on the post provided by Silence B. Dogood. Shutup and color.

    ReplyDelete